El Principio de Ahorro Justo y el fin del mundo

  • Daniel Loewe Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
  • Felipe Schwember Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
Palabras clave: Rawls, Teoría de justicia, Liberalismo político, principio de ahorro justo, escenarios catastróficos, calentamiento global

Resumen

El artículo examina las justificaciones realizadas por Rawls en Teoría de la justicia y en Liberalismo político a favor del Principio de Ahorro Justo, y utiliza como contexto de análisis los escenarios catastróficos que se proponen por recursos al calentamiento global y el cambio climático. Se sostiene que las justificaciones avanzadas por Rawls son insuficientes, y que su principio de ahorro es insuficiente para hacer frente a los desafíos que presentan estos escenarios catastróficos.

Biografía del autor/a

Daniel Loewe, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

Doctor en Filosof ́ıa de la Universidad de Tu ̈bingen, Alemania (2002), y licenciado en Filosof ́ıa de la Pontificia Universidad Cato ́lica de Chile. Profesor titular de la Facultad de Artes Liberales de la Universidad Adolfo Iba ́n ̃ez en Santiago de Chile.

Citas

"ACNUR. “Datos básicos” (2020). Disponible en: https://www.acnur.org/datos-basicos.html
Altieri, Andrew y Gedan, Keryn. “Climate change and dead zones”, Global change biology 21 No 4 (2014): 1395-1406.
Barry, Brian. “Justice between generations”. Law, Morality and Society. Essays in honor of H. L. A. Hart. Eds. Hacker, P. M. S. y Raz, J. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
Barry, Brian. Theories of Justice. USA: University of California Press, 1989.
Barry, Brian. Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Battisti, David y Naylor, Rosamond. “Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heats”, Science 323 No. 5911 (2009): 240-244.
Bleske-Rechek, April; Nelson, Lyndsay; Baker, Jonathan; Remiker, Mark & Brandt, Sarah. “Evolution and the Trolley Problem: People Save Five over One Unless the One Is Young, Genetically Related, or a Romantic Partner”, Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 4 (2010): 115-127.
Bostrom, Nick y Cirkovic, Milan (eds.). Global catasthophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Brown, Oli. “Migration and Climate Change”, International Organization for Migration (IOM) No. 31 (2008).
Buchanan, James & Tullock, Gordon. “The calculus of consent”. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1962.
Buchanan, James. The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and leviathan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
Burke, Marshall. et al. “Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production”, Nature 527 (2015): 235-239.
Chami, Ralph; Fullenkamp, Connel; Berzaghi, Fabio; Español-Jiménez, Sonia; Marcondes, Milton & Palazzo, Jose. “On Valuing Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change: A Framework with Application to Elephants and Whales”, ERID Working Paper Number 297 (2020).
English, Jane. “Justice between Generations”, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 31 No. 2 (1977): 91-104.
FAO. How to feed the world in 2050. Roma, 2009.
Feinberg, Joel. “The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations”. Philosophy and Environmental Crisis, ed. William Blackstone. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1974. 43-68.
Feinberg, Joel. “Harm and Self-Interest”. Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart, ed. P. M. S. Hacker and J. Raz. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977. 284-308.
Gardiner, Stephen. A perfect moral storm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Gauthier, David. Moral by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Goodell, Jeff. The water will come: rising seas, sinking cities, and the remaking of the civilized world. New York: Little, Brown & Co., 2017.
Hsiang, Solomon. et al. “Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States”. Science 356 (2017): 1362-1369.
Höffe, Otfried. Moral als Preis der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993.
Jonas, Hans. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilization. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984/1979.
Kant, Inmanuel. Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akademie Ausgabe, volumen VIII, 1784. Parcialmente disponible en: https://korpora.zim.uni-duisburg-essen.de/Kant/verzeichnisse-gesamt.html
Kymlicka, Will. “The social contract tradition”. A Companion of Ethics. Ed. Singer, P. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
Kolbert, Elizabeth. The sixth extinction. An unnatural history. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 2014.
Larraín, Sara. Ecología y política. Chile: Taurus, 2021.
Loewe, Daniel. “Inclusión de animales no-humanos en un marco de argumentación teórico contractual”, Veritas (2008).
Loewe, Daniel. “El calentamiento global y la asignación de los costes de las políticas medioambientales”, Dilemata No. 13 (2013).
Loewe, Daniel. “Refugiados climáticos: quién debe cargar los costos”, REMHU No.43 (2014): 169-187.
Loewe, Daniel. “El deber procreativo de Jonas y el problema de la no-identidad”, Revista de Filosofia Aurora 32/57 (2020a).
Loewe, Daniel. Ética y coronavirus. México: Fondo de cultura económica, 2020b.
Myers, Norman. “Environmental Refugees: An emergence security issue”, 13th Economic Forum, Oxford, Oxford University (2005).
Mulgan, Tim. Ethics for a broken world. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017.
Narveson, Jan. “Future people and us”. Obligations to future generations. Eds. Sikora, R. I.; Barry, B. USA, Philadelphia: White Horse Press, 1978.
Nussbaum, Martha. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2006.
Okin, Susan. Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books, 1989.
Pacific Institut. The world’s water, “water conflict”. 2018. (www.worldwater.org/water-conflict).
Parfit, Derek. “Rights, Interests and Possible People”. Moral Problems in Medicine. Ed. Gorovitz, S. New York: Englewood Cliffs, 1976.
Parfit, Derek. “Energy Policy and the Further Future: The identity Problem”. Energy and the Future. Eds. MacLean, D.; Brown, P. G. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1983.
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
Rawls, John. A theory of justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1971.
Rawls, John. Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979.
Rawls, John. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Rawls, John. A Theory of justice (revised edition). Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1999.
Rawls, John. The law of peoples, and the idea of public reason revisited. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1999.
Romm, Joseph. Climate change: what everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1998.
Schwember, Felipe. “Razón, consentimiento y contrato. El difícil mínimo común denominador de las teorías contractualistas”. Ideas y valores, volumen LXVIII, (2014): 101-127.
Sherwood, Steven y Huber, Matthew: “An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress”, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 107 no. 21 (2010): 9552-9555.
Stemmer, Peter. Handeln zugunsten anderer. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000.
Stern, Nicholas (ed.). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Sunstein, Cass. Worst-case scenarios. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.
Unesco. The United Nations World Water Development Report. 2018.
Webersik, Christian. “Sudan Climate Change and Security”. Factsheet Climate Change, Facts Sheets Series (2008) (http://www.ias.unu.edu/resource_centre/Sudan_Climate%20Change%20Facts%20Sheets%20Series_2008_2_lowres.pdf)
Wallace-Wells, Davis. El planeta inhóspito. España: Debate, 2020.
Wells, Donald. Environmental Policy: A Global Perspective for the TwentyFirst Century. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996.
Wissenburg, Marcel. Green Liberalism. The free and the green society. UK: Routledge, 1998."
Publicado
2021-12-30