Learning from Experience

A Reappraisal of Ayer's Interpretation of Hume's Empiricism

Authors

  • Sofía Beatriz Calvente National University of La Plata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69967/07194773.v1i13.192

Keywords:

Experience, British Empiricism, Logical Positivism, Judgments, Common Sense

Abstract

I propose to address two under-examined aspects of Alferd Ayer's contribution to the understanding of Hume's philosophy: his consideration of the inferential nature of perception and his proposal that experience has a public status. First, I will analyze how the Humean conception of experience has been understood. I will argue that Ayer's interpretation contributes to modifying the private and atomistic conception of experience that is usually attributed to Hume, by stating that in order to recognize an object, a simple act of perception is not enough, but it is required to establish a connection with a network of past perceptions. Secondly, I will analyze whether the mental nature of perceptions implies that their access is given only through introspection or if Hume himself contemplates the possibility that they can be communicated. Ayer argues that it is possible to attribute a public character to perceptions since he understands them as a series of sensory patterns that do not have traces of personal belonging but can be singled out from their occurrence at a specific time and place. This interpretation gives rise to his theory of the "world of common sense," which goes beyond what Hume proposes but is not contradictory to the main postulates of his philosophy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sofía Beatriz Calvente, National University of La Plata

Academic of Modern Philosophy of the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences of the National University of La Plata, Argentina.     

References

Referencias bibliográficas
Fuentes primarias
Ayer, Alfred Julius. Language, Truth and Logic. Londres: Penguin, 1971.
Ayer, Alfred Julius. Los problemas centrales de la filosofía. 1979. Madrid: Alianza, 1984.
Ayer, Alfred Julius. Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Ayer, Alfred Julius. Proposiciones básicas. Traducción de Margarita M. Valdés. México D. F.: Cuadernos del Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la Universidad Nacional de México N° 37, 1981.
Ayer, Alfred Julius. “A Defense of Empiricism.” A. J. Ayer Memorial Essays. A. Phillips Griffiths, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 1-16.
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: Critical Edition. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton, editores. 1739-40. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000. Edición en español: Tratado de la naturaleza humana. Félix Duque, traducción, introducción y notas. Buenos Aires: Orbis, 1984.Citado en el texto como T, seguido de número de libro, parte, sección y paginación de la edición canónica de Selby-Bigge precedida por las iniciales SB.
Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Tom L. Beauchamp, editor. 1748. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Edición en español: Investigación sobre el conocimiento humano. Jaime Salas Ortueta, traducción, prólogo y notas. Madrid: Alianza, 1980. Citado en el texto como EHU, seguido del número de sección y número de párrafo.

Fuentes secundarias
Baier, Annette. A Progress of Sentiments. Reflections on Hume's Treatise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.
Buckle, Stephen. Hume’s Enlightenment Tract. The Unity and Purpose of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding . Nueva York y Londres: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Dicker, Georges. Hume’s Epistemology and Metaphysics. An Introduction. Londres: Routledge, 1998.
Everson, Stephen. “The Difference between Feeling and Thinking,” Mind, new series, 97/ 387 (1988): 401-413.
Flew, Anthony. “Impressions and Experiences: Public or Private?,” Hume Studies 11/2 (1985): 183-191.
Garrett, Don. Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy. Nueva York y Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Kemp Smith, Norman. The Philosophy of David Hume. A Critical Study of its Origins and Central Doctrines. 1941. Don Garrett, introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan, 2005.
Loeb, Louis. From Descartes to Hume. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.
Loeb, Louis. Stability and Justification in Hume’s Treatise. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Mounce, H. O. Hume’s Naturalism. Nueva York y Londres: Routledge, 1999.
Carlin, Lawrence. The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed. Londres: Continuum, 2009.
Norton, David Fate. “The Myth of British Empiricism”, History of European Ideas, 1/ 4 (1981): 331-344.
Noxon, James. Hume’s Philosophical Development. A study of his methods. Londres: Oxford University Press, 1973.
Owen, David. Hume’s Reason. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Rábade Romero, Sergio. “La noción de experiencia en el empirismo inglés: Hume”, Diálogos. Revista del Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, IX/24 (1973): 33-51.
Rodríguez Valls, Francisco. “Experiencia y conocimiento en David Hume”, Thémata. Revista de Filosofía, 8 (1991): 45-67.
Schmidt, Claudia. David Hume: Reason in History. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.
Strawson, P. F. “Perception and its Objects” Vision and Mind. A. Noë y E. Thompson, editores. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002. 91-110.
Stroud, Barry. Hume. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge & Keagan Paul, 1977.
Stroud, Barry. “Ayer’s Hume.” Philosophers Past and Present. Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 117-143.
Traiger, Saul. “The Ownership of Perceptions: A Study of Hume’s Metaphysics.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 5/1 (1998): 41-51.
Yolton, John. “The Concept of Experience in Locke and Hume”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 1/1 (1963); 53-71.

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

Calvente, S. B. (2019). Learning from Experience: A Reappraisal of Ayer’s Interpretation of Hume’s Empiricism. Mutatis Mutandis: Revista Internacional De Filosofía, 1(13), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.69967/07194773.v1i13.192