The phenomenological project: the teleological culmination of philosophy
Keywords:
Phenomenology, teleology, essence, philosophy, humanity, eidosAbstract
This article introduces Husserl’s phenomenological project from his 1991 article Philosophy as a rigorous science, through which it is affirmed that the phenomenology would be the teleological culmination of philosophy. With this purpose, (i) I expose the problematic that gives birth to the phenomenological project, i.e., the crisis of the philosophy, of the sciences, and of the culture; then (ii), I show the genesis of the phenomenology from its critic to the naturalism, pointing out the teleological nature of the phenomenology that emerges from its primary object, teleology that makes possible the scientific character of philosophy; (iii) I finish exposing one moment of the phenomenological ethics with the aim of justifying the principal thesis, because the ethics is a clarification of the teleological essence of the human being that enables a re-directionality of European culture towards its end through a rational normativity, end that is an ethico-rational life, the same end of the philosophy.
References
BORRÀS, Joaquim Siles. The Ethics of Husserl’s Phenomenology. Responsibility and Ethical Life. Great Britain: Continuum, 2010.
BRAINARD, Marcus. Belief and its neutralization. USA: SUNY, 2002.
DESCARTES, René, Discurso del Método. Trad. Manuel García Morente. España: Gredos, 2011.
---. Los principios de la filosofía. Trad. Guillermo Quintas. España: RBA, 2002.
DONOHOE, Janet. Husserl on Ethics and Intersubjectivity. From Static to Genetic Phenomenology. USA: Humanity Books, 2004.
FICHTE, Johann. Fundamento de toda doctrina de la ciencia. Trad. Juan Cruz. España: Gredos, 2015.
FINK, Eugene. “Los conceptos operatorios en la fenomenología de Husserl”. En: AA.VV., Husserl. Tercer coloquio filosófico de Royaumont. Buenos Aires, 1968.
HOPKINS, Burt C. The Philosophy of Husserl. U.K.: ACUMEN, 2011.
HOYOS VÁZQUEZ, Guillerno. “La ética fenomenológica como responsabilidad para la renovación cultural”. En: Edmund Husserl, Renovación del hombre y de la cultura. Cinco ensayos, Trad. Agustín Serrano de Haro. España: Anthropos, 2002.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Investigaciones Lógicas, 1. Versión de Manuel G. Morente y José Gaos. España: Alianza Editorial, 1999.
---. “La crisis de la humanidad europea y la filosofía”. En: Edmund Husserl, La Crisis de las Ciencias Europeas, Trad. Jacobo Muñoz y Salvador Mas. España: Crítica, 1991b.
---. La Crisis de las Ciencias Europeas. Trad. Jacobo Muñoz y Salvador Mas. España: Crítica, 1991a.
---. La filosofía, ciencia rigurosa. Trad. Miguel García-Baró. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro, 2009.
---. La idea de la fenomenología. Trad. Miguel García-Baró. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2015.
---. Meditaciones cartesianas. Trad. José Gaos, Miguel García-Baró. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1994.
---. Renovación del hombre y de la cultura. Cinco ensayos. Trad. Agustín Serrano de Haro. España: Anthropos, 2002.
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica de la Razón Pura. Trad. Mario Caimi. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2011a.
---. Los progresos de la metafísica, Trad. Mario Caimi, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2011b.
---. Prolegómenos a toda metafísica futura que haya de poder presentarse como ciencia. Trad. Mario Caimi. España: Istmo, 1999.
LEIBNIZ, Gottfried. El Método Verdadero. Trad. J. Echeverría. España: Gredos, 2015.
MAKKVEL, Rudolf A. y Sebastian Luft. “Dilthey and the Neo-kantians: the dispute over the status of the human and cultural sciencies”. En: The Routdlege Companion to Nineteenth Century Philosophy, Ed. Dean Moyar. USA: Routledge, 2010.
MOHANTY, J. N. “The Development of Husserl’s Thought”. En: The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, Ed. Smith Barry y David Woodruff. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
PLATÓN. Fedón. Trad. C. García Gual, Diálogos III. España: Gredos, 1998.
---. Timeo. Trad. Francisco Lisi, Diálogos VI. España: Gredos, 2007.
PRADELLE, Dominique. “La doctrine phénoménologique de la raison: rationalités sans faculté rationnelle”. Husserl, la science de phenomènes, Ed. Antoine Grandjean y Laurent Perreau. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aockfz_KBavP4OYo2rVRFQtr4
WWMqjxH/view?usp=sharing] Consultado el 30-09-2019, sin fecha.
SCHUMANN, Kart. “La idea de la filosofía”. En: Actualidad de Husserl, Ed. Antonio Zirión. México: Alianza Editorial, 1990. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/lgl19vPH7
2d/1gl19vPH72t0tLahuUiQHKVe_hIVOUfPg/view?usp=sharing]. Consultado el 30-09-2019.
SPINOZA, Baruch. Tratado de la reforma del entendimiento. Trad. Atilano Domínguez. España: Alianza Editorial, 1988.
STRAGE, Steven K. “The Double Explanation in the Timaeus”. Plato1, Metaphysics and Epistemology. Ed. Gail Fine. USA, Oxford University Press, 1999.
WILD, J., “La antropología filosófica y la crisis de las ciencias europeas”, en AA.VV., Husserl. Tercer coloquio filosófico de Royaumont. Buenos Aires, 1968.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors give the journal the right of first publication, with the work being under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to use what is published provided they refer to the author or authors of the I am already working on its publication in this magazine.
The authors are free to make other contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article they publish in this journal (such as it can be included in an institutional collection or published in a book), provided that they clearly specify the original publication of the work in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) in the form of a "working paper" or "preprint" prior to and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)
