Husserl on Kant and the critical view of logic
Keywords:
Husserl, Kant, Parsons, Logic, NormativityAbstract
This paper seeks to clarify Husserl’s critical remarks about Kant’s view of logic by comparing their respective views of logic. In his Formal and Transcendental Logic (1929, §100) Husserl criticizes Kant for not asking transcendental questions about formal logic, but rather ascribing an ‘extraordinary apriority’ to it. He thinks the reason for Kant’s uncritical attitude to logic lies in Kant’s view of logic as directed toward the subjective, instead of being concerned with a ‘“world” of ideal Objects’. Whereas for Kant, general logic is about laws of reasoning. Husserl thinks that formal logic should describe formal structures. Husserl claims that if Kant had had a more comprehensive concept of logic, he would have thought of raising critical questions about how logic is possible. This kind of criticism cannot itself use forms of judgments or syllogisms of logic, nor even the ‘inferential’ [Schliessende] method more generally, but should be descriptive in nature. Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology is the method for such criticism. The paper argues that this results in reflection, and possibly revision, of the logical principles with respect to the normative goals governing the investigation in question.
Downloads
References
Husserl, E. (1956). Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil, kritische Ideengeschichte. (Hrsg. Rudolf Boehm). Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1999). Investigaciones lógicas. (Trads. José Gaos y Manuel García Morente). Alianza, Madrid.
Husserl, E. (2008). La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología transcendental. (Traducción y estudio preliminar de Julia V. Iribarne). Prometeo Libros, Buenos Aires.
Husserl, E. (2009). Lógica formal y lógica trascendental. (Trad. Antonio Zirión Quijano). IIF-UNAM, México.
Husserl, E. (2013). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. Libro primero, Introducción general a la fenomenología pura. (Nueva edición y refundición integral de la traducción de José Gaos por Antonio Zirión Quijano). UNAM-IIF, FCE, México.
Kant, I. (1999). Prolegómenos a toda metafísica futura que haya de poder presentarse como ciencia. (Edición, traducción, comentarios y notas por Mario Caimi). Ediciones Istmo, S. A., España.
Kant, I. (2009). Crítica de la razón pura. (Traducción, comentarios y notas por Mario Caimi). FCE/UNAM/UAM-I, México.
Hartimo, M. (2018). Husserl on Completeness, Definitely. Synthese, 195 (6), 1509–1527.
Hartimo, M. (2019). Constitution and Construction. In C. Weiss (Ed.). Constructive Semantics – Meaning in Between Phenomenology and Constructivism. Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science Series. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21313-8.
Heffernan, G. (1989). Isagoge in die phänomenologische Apophantik. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hintikka, J. ([1996] 2003). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kjosavik, F. (2022). Kant on the possibilities of mathematics and the scope and limits of logic. Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 65 (6). doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1651087
Parsons, C. (2012). Arithmetic and the Categories. In From Kant to Husserl, 42–68. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Parsons, C. (2015). Infinity and a Critical View of Logic. Inquiry, 58 (1), 1–19.
Schuhmann, K. (1977). Husserl-Chronik, Denk- und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sher, G. (2016). Epistemic Friction: An Essay on Knowledge, Truth, and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-07-14 (2)
- 2024-04-03 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mirja Hartimo & Luis Canela Morales
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivaties License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that indicates: a) It is allowed that others share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, b) The work may not be used for commercial purposes, c) If it's remixed, transformed, or built upon the material, it is not allowed to distribute the modified material.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, website or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.