The action of image. The Boehm’s concept of iconic difference and its relation with the platonic theory of arts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69967/07194773.v1i10.25Keywords:
image, language, iconic difference, production, meaningAbstract
This article has the general aim of explain the image theory of Gottfried Boehm and in particular his concept of iconic difference. For this, I present the beginning of this theory both in the platonic philosophy and in the contemporary language philosophy to show his independence as theory thanks to the develop of the key concept of image interpretation: the iconic difference.
Downloads
References
Boehm, G. (2011). “El giro icónico. Una carta. Correspondencia entre Gottfried Boehm y W. J. Thomas Mitchell (I)”. En García Varas, Ana. (ed.), Filosofía de la imagen. (pp. 57-70). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
Boehm, G. (2012)[2006]. “El retorno de las imágenes” [Die Wiederkehr der Bilder]. En Boehm, Gottfried (ed.), Was ist ein Bild? (pp.11-38). Friburgo: Fink.
Boehm, G. (2011) “¿Más allá del lenguaje? Apuntes sobre la lógica de las imágenes”. En García Varas, Ana. (ed.), Filosofía de la imagen. (pp. 87-106).
Boehm, G. (2013). “Indeterminacy. On the Logic of the Image”. En Huppauf, Bernd. y Wulf, Christoph. (eds.), Dynamics and Performativity of Imagination. The Image Between the Visible and the Invisible. (pp. 219-229). New York: Routledge.
Cassirer, E. (1995) “Eidos et Eidolon. Le problème du beau et de l’art dans les dialogues de Platon”, en Écrits sur l’art. Paris: Cerf: 27-52.
Elkins, J. (2010). “Un seminario sobre teoría de la imagen”. Estudios Visuales 9, 2010. Obtenido el 3 de marzo del 2016 desde <http://www.estudiosvisuales.net/revista/pdf/num7/09_elkins.pdf>.
Fronterotta, F. (2000). “L’interprétation néo-kantienne de la théorie platonicienne des idées et son «héritage» philosophique”. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 98: 318-340.
Másmela, C. Dialéctica de la imagen: una interpretación del Sofista de Platón. Barcelona: Anthropos, 2006.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2011). “El giro pictorial. Una respuesta. Correspondencia entre Gottfried Boehm y W.J. Thomas Mitchell (II)”. En García Varas, Ana. (ed.), Filosofía de la imagen. (pp. 71-86).
Rilke R. M. (1978). Cartas sobre Cézanne. Trad. De Andrea Pagni. Buenos Aires: Goncourt.
Rubio, R. “La rehabilitación ontológica de la imagen. Heidegger lector de Kant”. Ektasis: revista de fenomenología e hermenêutica. V. 2, n° 2, 2013: 12-27.
Wiesing, L. Hacer ver. La praxis del mostrar. Traducción parcial de R. Rubio, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Mutatis Mutandis: International Journal of Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivaties License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that indicates: a) It is allowed that others share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, b) The work may not be used for commercial purposes, c) If it's remixed, transformed, or built upon the material, it is not allowed to distribute the modified material.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, website or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
